PENN & TELLER SHARE THOUGHTS ON THE GLOBAL WARMING SCAM
An oldie but goodie. Penn & Teller have this to say
Any questions?...
Monday, May 5, 2008
THE GLOBAL POVERTY ACT (S.2433)
Not yet convinced Barack Hussein Obama is a radical socialist, intent on bringing to reality the complete subservience of our Republic to the United Nations?
I've sat and stared at this garbage for months. Being one grade level above Jethro Clampett, I had a hard time trying to articulate some sort of 'wonkish', 'Krauthammerish' analysis. So, let me give you a quick Buffoon-like back brief, accompanied by links to articles written by folks much smarter than me. Sound good?
14 REASONS NOT TO VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON
This post is from Writer Chick's Blog and was originally written last year Septemberish time frame. It's one of the more popular post at my old blog and as the socialist continue to fight it out, it is a good reminder to say the least. Like any of us would be dumb enough to vote for her. Enjoy!
by Writer Chick
The 08 elections aren’t too far off and the campaigning will really wind up once Labor Day weekend hits, so I’ve been thinking politics lately. Not the day to day stuff, sometimes I can’t keep up and frankly, sometimes, it’s just too much. But I do like speculate and look at the landscape sometimes.
I’ve made no secret that I’m not a Hillary fan and have gotten in my cracks about her with the occasional post - but this time I want to spell out why I feel as I do. Don’t worry, it won’t be too political. And really some of my reasons may surprise.
The reasons (incomplete and in no particular order) why Hillary won’t get my vote:
1. Mean eyes. It’s one of those things that can’t be covered up with makeup or false smiles, photo lenses or filters. Even when she smiles, her eyes don’t. I could never trust someone who had mean eyes.
2. Hillary-care. A behind-closed-doors health plan with the 1st Lady as its architect? It was so bad, apparently, that even her cronies couldn’t vote for it. And it was the first attempt (of thousands) on her part to be the President of the United States without having been elected. A blatant attempt to use her husband’s power to serve her own ends.
3. No sense of humor. Even when she tries to make a joke it’s forced and usually denigrates someone. People who cannot laugh at themselves have serious problems in my estimation. Too much ego to ever have any humility and probably feels they are incapable of making a mistake.
4. Doesn’t believe in anything (no real position on any issue). Aside from (obviously) wanting to run the free world, the woman is without purpose and position. Like her husband, her position on issues change with each new audience and demographic. Everything is surveyed and polled in order to determine what position should be taken. This means there is an utter lack of conviction in anything she says. She is apparently for everything and against everything equally.
5. She cheated. A resident of Arkansas one day, then after getting a multi-million dollar advance on a tell-all book (which apparently didn’t tell all), a purchase of a multimillion dollar home and voila, she was a New Yorker. So she could run for a Senate seat that was vacating. How does that classify her as representative of the people of New York?
Sunday, May 4, 2008
WHY WON'T WHITES, JEWS AND CATHOLICS VOTE FOR OBAMA?
by Bill Levinson
Reproduction and circulation of the following as a viral E-mail, and/or re-posting at other blogs, is encouraged.Despite the endorsement of Senator Robert Casey (D-PA), Barack Obama lost the Pennsylvania primary by a 55-45 margin. In Luzerne County PA, a traditional Democratic region whose demographics include factory workers and the descendents of immigrant coal miners (many Catholic), Obama lost by a three to one margin. Why does Barack Obama have so much difficulty in getting white people (and especially Catholics and Jews) to vote for him? Let’s give “Barry” some hints and see his likely conclusion.
Saturday, May 3, 2008
I DON'T LIKE THE SOUND OF ANY OF THIS ONE BIT!
The United States Senate may vote any day on the stealth imposition of what could amount to an $845 BILLION United Nations style global tax on American citizens?
It's called the Global Poverty Act (S.2433), and it is being sponsored by none other than Senator Barack Obama.
According to some conservative sources, this disastrous legislation could eventually force U.S. taxpayers to fork over as much as 0.7 percent of the nation's Gross Domestic Product -- or $845,000,000,000.00 -- on welfare to third-world countries.
Here's what Phyllis Schlafly, conservative activist and founder of Eagle Forum, recently wrote:
"Obama's costly, dangerous and altogether bad bill (S. 2433), which could come up in the Senate any day, is called the Global Poverty Act. It would commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7 percent of our Gross Domestic Product on foreign handouts..." [Emphasis Mine]
Time is of the essence because Senator Joe Biden, the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee just issued a report on the Global Poverty Act and it was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar on Thursday the 24th.
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
